<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>US-China on Andy's Analysis</title><link>https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/tags/us-china/</link><description>Recent content from Andy's Analysis</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>andy@1024ai.cc (Andy)</managingEditor><webMaster>andy@1024ai.cc (Andy)</webMaster><copyright>All articles on this blog are licensed under the BY-NC-SA license agreement unless otherwise stated. Please indicate the source when reprinting!</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/tags/us-china/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The AI Chip War in 2026: A Marathon With No Finish Line</title><link>https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/posts/ai-chip-war-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>andy@1024ai.cc (Andy)</author><guid>https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/posts/ai-chip-war-2026/</guid><description>
<![CDATA[<h1>The AI Chip War in 2026: A Marathon With No Finish Line</h1><p>Author: Andy(andy@1024ai.cc)</p>
        
          <h1 id="the-ai-chip-war-in-2026-a-marathon-with-no-finish-line">
<a class="header-anchor" href="#the-ai-chip-war-in-2026-a-marathon-with-no-finish-line"></a>
The AI Chip War in 2026: A Marathon With No Finish Line
</h1><p>By May 2026, the narrative around the AI chip war has shifted away from &ldquo;who builds the most powerful GPU&rdquo; and toward something far more structural: <strong>where do chips flow, who controls that flow, and at what cost?</strong></p>
<p>In our previous piece (May 10), we analyzed how the three &ldquo;AI godfathers&rdquo; at Davos each revealed their geopolitical calculations through their public statements. Just one day later, new variables are entering the game.</p>
        
        <hr><p>Published on 2026-05-11 at <a href='https://blog.1024ai.cc/'>Andy's Analysis</a>, last modified on 2026-05-11</p>]]></description><category>Analysis</category></item><item><title>The Geopolitical Choices of AI Godfathers — From Chip Wars to Capital Games</title><link>https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/posts/ai-geopolitics-godfathers/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>andy@1024ai.cc (Andy)</author><guid>https://blog.1024ai.cc/en/posts/ai-geopolitics-godfathers/</guid><description>
<![CDATA[<h1>The Geopolitical Choices of AI Godfathers — From Chip Wars to Capital Games</h1><p>Author: Andy(andy@1024ai.cc)</p>
        
          <h1 id="the-geopolitical-choices-of-ai-godfathers--from-chip-wars-to-capital-games">
<a class="header-anchor" href="#the-geopolitical-choices-of-ai-godfathers--from-chip-wars-to-capital-games"></a>
The Geopolitical Choices of AI Godfathers — From Chip Wars to Capital Games
</h1><p>At the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos, a subtle shift is underway: the three most influential figures in tech — Jensen Huang, Lisa Su, and Sam Altman — have independently shifted their focus from &ldquo;AI changing the world&rdquo; to &ldquo;how the world is changing AI.&rdquo; This time, they are not discussing model parameters or computing breakthroughs, but export controls, sovereign AI, and corporate survival rules amid great-power competition.</p>
        
        <hr><p>Published on 2026-05-10 at <a href='https://blog.1024ai.cc/'>Andy's Analysis</a>, last modified on 2026-05-10</p>]]></description><category>Analysis</category></item></channel></rss>